Publications » Position papers » Carbon Border Adjustment - EUROFER contribution to the public consultation
Carbon Border Adjustment - EUROFER contribution to the public consultation
Downloads and links
Recent updates
Deep emission reductions are technically achievable in the EU steel industry only with the right framework in place, including support for investment in innovation and roll-out, the
creation of markets for green materials, the availability of the competitive low carbon energy sources, an international level playing field, and the application of EU trade defence
instruments against trade distortions.
Higher climate ambition, which will translate into higher carbon costs and emission reduction efforts, requires strengthened carbon leakage measures, in particular for sectors at highest risk due to high trade exposure and energy intensity such as steel.
Steel products sold on the EU market, whether produced in the EU or imported from third countries, need to have similar CO2 cost constraints. EU steel exports need also to have CO2 cost level playing field on global steel markets.
A well designed and effective CBA ensures that all emissions come with a cost, regardless of their country of origin, and provides strengthened carbon leakage protection only if it
complements and addresses the shortcomings of the existing measures, which shall be based on 100% of the benchmarks, without any reduction.
A CBA with full auctioning would have a disruptive impact on the EU steel industry and the related value chains, as it would expose EU steel producers and downstream sectors to the full carbon costs, undermining the financial ability to invest in low carbon technologies and jeopardising the competitiveness of EU exports.
In order to prevent carbon leakage, the CBA should be introduced in a way that the importer has on one side a comparable carbon cost level to the EU industry and on the other side a sufficiently high incentive to decarbonise, while addressing the risks of cost absorption and source shifting. The design of the CBA should also take into account the fact that EU producers are subject to the carbon costs for their entire production, while importers would be subject only for the quantities exported to the EU. Due to that, a CBA set at a too low level would not provide the sufficient carbon cost constraint to avoid carbon leakage.
Download this publication or visit associated links
Brussels, 05 June 2025 – The high level of uncertainty and major disruptions caused by the new U.S. tariffs have dealt a severe blow to recovery expectations in the steel market for 2025. Against the backdrop of broader economic resilience driven by services, industry remains weak, weighing on steel demand and consumption. Recovery is not expected before 2026, and only if positive developments emerge in the global geoeconomic outlook. According to EUROFER’s latest Economic and Steel Market Outlook, the recession in apparent steel consumption will continue in 2025 (-0.9%) for the fourth consecutive year (-1.1% in 2024), contrary to earlier forecasts of growth (+2.2%). A similar trend is expected for steel-using sectors, with another recession in 2025 (-0.5%, after -3.7% in 2024) instead of a projected recovery (+1.6%). Steel imports remained at historically high levels (27%) throughout 2024.
Second quarter 2025 report. Data up to, and including, fourth quarter 2024
Brussels, 4 June 2025 – With U.S. blanket tariffs now raised to 50%, the only way to avoid the further erosion of the European steel market and another blow to European steelmakers is the swift implementation of the “highly effective trade measure” promised by the European Commission in its Steel and Metals Action Plan. A negotiated solution between the EU and the U.S. is also vital to preserve EU steel exports to the U.S., warns the European Steel Association.