Publications » Position papers » Carbon Border Adjustment - EUROFER contribution to the public consultation
Carbon Border Adjustment - EUROFER contribution to the public consultation
Downloads and links
Recent updates
Deep emission reductions are technically achievable in the EU steel industry only with the right framework in place, including support for investment in innovation and roll-out, the
creation of markets for green materials, the availability of the competitive low carbon energy sources, an international level playing field, and the application of EU trade defence
instruments against trade distortions.
Higher climate ambition, which will translate into higher carbon costs and emission reduction efforts, requires strengthened carbon leakage measures, in particular for sectors at highest risk due to high trade exposure and energy intensity such as steel.
Steel products sold on the EU market, whether produced in the EU or imported from third countries, need to have similar CO2 cost constraints. EU steel exports need also to have CO2 cost level playing field on global steel markets.
A well designed and effective CBA ensures that all emissions come with a cost, regardless of their country of origin, and provides strengthened carbon leakage protection only if it
complements and addresses the shortcomings of the existing measures, which shall be based on 100% of the benchmarks, without any reduction.
A CBA with full auctioning would have a disruptive impact on the EU steel industry and the related value chains, as it would expose EU steel producers and downstream sectors to the full carbon costs, undermining the financial ability to invest in low carbon technologies and jeopardising the competitiveness of EU exports.
In order to prevent carbon leakage, the CBA should be introduced in a way that the importer has on one side a comparable carbon cost level to the EU industry and on the other side a sufficiently high incentive to decarbonise, while addressing the risks of cost absorption and source shifting. The design of the CBA should also take into account the fact that EU producers are subject to the carbon costs for their entire production, while importers would be subject only for the quantities exported to the EU. Due to that, a CBA set at a too low level would not provide the sufficient carbon cost constraint to avoid carbon leakage.
Download this publication or visit associated links
Brussels, 11 September 2025 – The lack of a solution for steel in the EU-U.S. trade negotiations, the ongoing unpredictability of the global geoeconomic situation, and persistently weak demand against an ever-growing global steel overcapacity are squeezing the European steel market. In 2025, the outlook points to stagnation, with potential recovery only in 2026 — conditional on improvements in the global economy and an easing of trade tensions. According to EUROFER’s latest Economic and Steel Market Outlook, another recession both in apparent steel consumption (-0.2%, revised upwards from -0.9%) and in steel-using sectors (-0.7%, revised downwards from -0.5%) is confirmed for 2025. Growth prospects are now delayed at least to 2026, with projections of a rebound for both apparent steel consumption (+3.1%) and steel-using sectors (+1.8%). However, steel imports continue to hold historically high market shares (25%) in 2025.
Third quarter 2025 report. Data up to, and including, first quarter 2025
Brussels, 10 September 2025 – Reacting to today’s State of the Union Address delivered by Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, Axel Eggert, Director General of the European Steel Association (EUROFER) said: